Comments on: It's not Photosynth… its flash and google…. http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/2008/06/postid-100/ if at first you do succeed try not to look astonished Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:13:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Me http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/2008/06/postid-100/#comment-37 Me Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:47:50 +0000 http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/?p=100#comment-37 Well every photo that I put up is geotagged (well nearly all) and it is not the hard to filter for only the geotagged photos. I put a lot more photos on flickr than I do anywhere else and given the amount of devices that can/or very shortly will be geotagging such as all the n-series nokias and others... there is a massive collection of geotagged. also my point was that the flickr photos would let you move into a building... and the panoramio will never as they are external.. gives flickr an edge. Well every photo that I put up is geotagged (well nearly all) and it is not the hard to filter for only the geotagged photos.

I put a lot more photos on flickr than I do anywhere else and given the amount of devices that can/or very shortly will be geotagging such as all the n-series nokias and others… there is a massive collection of geotagged. also my point was that the flickr photos would let you move into a building… and the panoramio will never as they are external.. gives flickr an edge.

]]> By: rankfa http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/2008/06/postid-100/#comment-36 rankfa Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:07:31 +0000 http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/?p=100#comment-36 I think you are wrong about the flickr idea. Flickr has much more photos than panoramio, also picassa does. But, both sets of photos are not good when you try to geolocate them. Their photos are not place related and are not good to illustrate places. IMO that's the reason Google is using Panoramio images in Google Maps instead of Picassa images (They have much more photos, even more than flickr I believe) I think you are wrong about the flickr idea.
Flickr has much more photos than panoramio, also picassa does. But, both sets of photos are not good when you try to geolocate them. Their photos are not place related and are not good to illustrate places. IMO that’s the reason Google is using Panoramio images in Google Maps instead of Picassa images (They have much more photos, even more than flickr I believe)

]]>