<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Zoom Range FX/DX Lenses for a Nikon D90 11-300mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/2010/01/postid-854/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/2010/01/postid-854/</link>
	<description>if at first you do succeed try not to look astonished</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:13:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/2010/01/postid-854/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/?p=854#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Actually the focal length is always measured in FX, and to make a fair comparison the sensor of the camera should be in the same place for every shot.

If you still don&#039;t get the same on the Sigma 18-200 and Nikkor 70-300, well, let&#039;s say I do not trust Sigma, so probably it doesn&#039;t go all the way up to 200 really then ;)

(If your statement would be true. The difference between 200DX and 200FX would be as large as 200FX and 300FX, which clearly are not true).

Nice test though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the focal length is always measured in FX, and to make a fair comparison the sensor of the camera should be in the same place for every shot.</p>
<p>If you still don&#8217;t get the same on the Sigma 18-200 and Nikkor 70-300, well, let&#8217;s say I do not trust Sigma, so probably it doesn&#8217;t go all the way up to 200 really then <img src='http://www.wolfcat.com.au/randomrants/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(If your statement would be true. The difference between 200DX and 200FX would be as large as 200FX and 300FX, which clearly are not true).</p>
<p>Nice test though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

